With beach
sand and dust, sea and salt air, Cape Verde is a tough environment for plants
and botanists alike. Sleeping outdoors every night, climbing epic peaks and
roughing it ups the ante for botanists and the equipment
they carry hugely! This is my first equipment test as the Rogue Botanist: expedition tested equipment that won't fail, so you never have to!
Considering the physical challenges of the locale, I scoured the web for a backup camera for my trusty
joined-at-the-hipbelt companion - the weatherproofed Olympus OM-D EM5 Mk II. My
eyes naturally gravitated towards Olympus, and in particular the 2016 release
of the TG-870 - the latest in Olympus's lineup of 'tough' cameras. There are
several things that I consider critical when choosing a camera: is it tough
enough to handle the field, does it have a good macro, does it focus on the
foreground subject and can I take shots with one hand? The TG-870 ticks all
these boxes and more. It has a wider-than-usual lens, relatively quick GPS, a
flip screen for viewing tricky subjects, has a dust-proof body and is
submersible to 15m.
There
are several excellent sites out there that give hands on reviews of
this camera (eg. Ken Rockwell, Digital Camera HQ). In
this review focused on botanical expedition-worthy equipment, I'm going to give
my considered, harsh yet fair appraisal of this
dynamite-comes-in-small-packages camera. I think I’ve picked up many points not
covered in other reviews. This shows the camera after three months of solid use
that leaves this camera scratched, dented and dinged - but less worthy equipment broken and
deflated on their first day out.
My Digital Camera Background
I've had many cameras,
and was one of the earliest botanists within South Africa to recognize the
tremendous advantages of digital cameras over slides in documenting and cataloging plants. My first camera was the extraordinary 3MP Nikon Coolpix 995,
purchased in 2002. This was an astonishing camera in many ways, and packed crisp
photos into a tiny and tough body. It had a brilliant macro which thanks to its
tiny sensor gave better than 1:1 macro, it was compact and light, dustproof and
my favourite part – a split-body that
was both intuitive and engaging that compelled one to point the screen at oneself
while the subject faced elsewhere. It had an unparalleled macro with huge depth of field, and the form factor meant that you could get shots of flowers at ground level almost without shading them. In many ways I have been pining for a worthy
successor to this model ever since.
|
The extraordinary botanical juggernaut - the Nikon Coolpix 995 (Photo: www.dpreview.com) |
Two years later I
upgraded to the 4MP Coolpix 4500, a step backwards in several ways, one of
which was losing the focal-distance scale (replaced with a ridiculous scale
bar), and the other having a cheap trigger setup held by plastic pins that
eventually broke. Sticking with Nikon I upgraded to the D70 SLR that took great
pictures but was big and heavy and lacked video. It eventually died when the
pins of the horrible flash-card format got pushed in for the second time. From
there my Lumix GH-2 promised excellent image or video quality in a
lighter-weight body. Yet it too succumbed, this time from corrosion due to a
rainstorm. Times were hard and I ended up buying a series of medium range
compact cameras from Canon that broke within months.
Last year I splashed
out and settled on the weatherproof, ridiculously customizable OM-D EM-5 as my
serious camera. But despite being small and lightweight compared to most APS-C
DSLR’s, it is still big and clumsy, and most importantly lacks a decent wide
angle macro lens that is fully compatible with the camera (the supposedly
compatible 35mm Olympus lens alas, does a terrible job of focusing). Also I
didn’t have a wide-angle lens beyond the 28mm kit lens, nor a camera that can
do panorama stitching. I found an early model of the TG range which was cheap,
but dinged and scratched with a barely useable rear screen. So I looked online
to see if Olympus had released anything more… enticing. Enter the elegant-looking,
mean-acting, quick-thinking, strong-enough for Mr T - Tough TG-870.
Lens and lens quality
The TG-870 boasts one
of the widest lenses of any compact camera, a 21 – 105 mm equivalent lens. This
is technically in ultra-wide territory, and far wider than my 14 - 40mm kit
lens which on the OM-D is a 28 mm equivalent lens. For landscape shots, this
lens delivers good shots which paired with the 16MP effective Backside
Illumination-sensor and Truepic VII imaging engine, delivers clean images, rich
colours and a blue sky.
It has a reasonable
and fairly pedestrian 5x lens. I barely use the zoom-in feature except when
trying to snap fruits or flowers that would otherwise be inaccessible, or when documenting
bushes on adjacent cliffs. I would like in these circumstances to be able to
zoom further, but it is a minor issue superseded by more pressing issues.
The macro is fantastic
– about the same… nay better in macro mode than my 2:1 equivalent macro lens on
my bigger-bodied camera. I love that the 1cm macro is paired with a wide-angle
lens delivering a delightful view of macro subjects in context. The difference
in sharpness between these lenses at macro level is obvious and palpable
though. On the Tough, purple and yellow fringing appear and images appear hazy,
particularly towards the outside of the image. So obvious in fact that it makes
super-macro mode all but unusable!
Image quality
Images from the camera
are acceptable verging on good. They lack a certain sharpness and crispness
that is unfortunate. Nonetheless for record shots which is what I spend most of
my time doing, it fits the bill. The compressed 4608x3456 (16MP) images are a
bloated 7MB in size, which is acceptable for my Olympus OM-D, but seems excessive
for this camera given the softness of the lens.
|
A picture of Carprobrotus that reveals the quality this camera is capable of. |
|
A pixel-peeper crop of the image above displayed at 1:1. Not bad! |
Despite its BSI
sensor, I found the noise a force to be reckoned with, especially above ISO 400
or in low-light.
|
A picture of "Mordor" on Cape Verde. Almost no detail is visible. This is taken at a modest ISO 800 and 1/30th of a second. |
|
A crop of "Mordor" showing almost no detail and significant chroma noise. |
Layout of controls
My old Coolpix 995 and
several other cameras have suffered from poor layout that led to me
accidentally pushing on or more buttons. Other than the zoom button that I
sometimes find myself accidentally pressing, I find most of the controls
reasonably laid out with good tactile feedback.
Menu Layout
I find the menu system
acceptable bar one glaring irritating flaw – deleting images. Something one
does fairly often, especially on a long trip with limited disk space. There is
a button earmarked for deletion. Press it and you will find out how NOT TO SET
UP A DELETE BUTTON - Olympus! Step 1. Press the play button. Step 2. Press the
erase button. Step 3. Skip past Slideshow and Edit to Erase. Step 4. Don’t be
tempted to Sel(ect) Image(s), but skip to Erase. Step 5. Skip Cancel and select
Erase. There, you’ve deleted an an image, that wasn’t so hard, was it?!
The rest of the menus
are poor to adequate – nothing special, with some powerful features embedded
several screens away. The first screen has such arcane things as Wi-fi start (a
feature I have not yet figured out how to use), Reset (I haven’t dared press it
though I guess it resets everything to factory settings – sounds like a last
resort). Compression – something you’ll
do once in the life of a camera (set it to fine) unless you are running out of
space. AF Mode (again I’ve never changed it), and Metering (something I’ve
never changed).
I found the choice of
features a little irritating to get to as well. I’d frequently have to spend 15
seconds changing the settings to obtain the one I wanted. An example is THE
SELECT MENU.
No quick way to adjust
the exposure. (Press OK, scroll past picture filter and flash setting to
exposure, then select exposure value and press OK). Fortunately the
auto-exposure does such a great job that it seldom blows out the brights from
yellow or white flowers.
Customisation
I love customization.
If this is for you, then don’t get this camera. There is no ability to change
the aperture, and no ability to manually focus. That’s right folks. None. In
all fairness – the exposure is usually spot on and focus is usually quick and simple
– but not always.
One useful change is
the button setup. Go to the Menu | bottom-most Settings Menu 3 | For the top
one select Super Macro. The red button at the bottom front left of the camera I
use for all my macro photos. It allows you to focus closer than a few cm, and
zooms in very slightly allowing that wide-angle macro view. This is different
to super-macro that zooms in significantly more and introduces lots of fringing
and unwanted image artifacts.
Picture Styles and the Scroll-Wheel
The scroll-wheel has a
raft of eight useful looking options.
iAuto Mode is
just a crippled mode for people with no brains and no style.
The P Mode is
my go-to mode for all my partial customizable settings. It even has access to
picture styles.
I use three or four
picture styles. My standard ‘normal’ one is Vivid. Natural and Muted appear no
different to me. Reflection is my favourite filter – reflecting the image
around the X axis. Dramatic Tone I have used a few times to good effect, but it
seems to unfortunately radically degrade the picture quality. Some filters like
Keyline and Watercolor just seem horribly implemented and virtually unusable.
|
A ridgeline trail at the St. Antao, Cape Verde. Taken with Dramatic Tone setting that gives great effects but loses details. |
Scene (SCN) gives access to
all your favourite (NOT) art filters – exactly the same but without the
reflection, fisheye and jumble effects, or the tonal effects. Scene gives the HDR
option, the most important picture style of them all (but I tend to forget
about it because it’s under SCN. This is also how you access Interval Shooting
(which you setup first in Menu | Settings | Interval). Pressing OK is also how
you access a raft of other scenes like Wide 1 which has a picture of a fish and
is ‘ideal for underwater landscape photos’, vs. Wide 2 which has a picture of
dolphins and is ‘ideal for underwater action scenes’. Yes, did you pick up my
sarcasm. I’ve barely experimented with these because of the obscure usages or
because potentially useful things like Interval Shooting and Live Composite
will take too much battery.
|
Sepia picture style - Euphorbia tuckeyana at the crater of San Antao |
|
Keyline picture style |
|
The absolutely useless Watercolor picture style. Yes this is a picture. |
|
Vintage picture style |
|
Grainy film picture style |
|
Pinhole picture style |
Super macro is
really useful, or would be if it didn’t give such atrocious picture quality.
Sport I have never used.
The only time I would need it is for a rabbit bursting out of the bush, and
then it will take me too long to setup the camera for this. Also this doesn’t
have the zoom, picture quality or performance for most sports photography, so
it seems a little redundant to me.
Panorama
mode is pretty well implemented. Simply set it to auto and start panning.
Unfortunately there is no guide keeping you on track. And really unfortunately
the resulting picture resolution is so low (as I found out after my trip) that
it is essentially useless for printing. That’s right. It’s better to take
normal photos then stitch them afterwards using your favourite pirated
stitching software. But wait – did I mention there is no way to lock the
exposure outside panorama mode!
|
Panorama showing adequate picture but poor resolution and sky blown out. |
Portrait mode
I never use. Let’s see... Oh wait – it’s simply a subset of five of the Art
photographs!
Movie mode (the back
orange button by default) is pretty good and has image stabilization built in
as well as impressively allowing HD shooting at 60P. Pity you can’t focus or
change the lighting – but it’s a good start. Also there is no external
microphone jack, and the sound quality is good, but not great. Especially when
there is lots of wind, like most of the time in Cape Verde or the Cape of South
Africa.
Build and Build Quality
But back to the
virtues of this camera. It feels lovely and solid in the hand. They claim you
can drop it from 2m (onto sand). I’ve tested this inadvertently on a few occasions,
and it thus far delivers on the promise! A lesser camera would not have
survived the drops I have subjected this camera to. The lens is slightly
recessed so it has no scratches on it. Lucky because there is no cap or
protection for it. It does mean that wiping the screen regularly of dust and
gunge becomes a necessity. The lens is also positioned at the top of the
camera. Clever – because at the macro distance at which this camera shines, a
centred lens would obscure light. It also allows me to turn the camera upside
down and get those itsy bitsy subjects at ground level. Pity the screen only
flips one direction, so you can’t angle the camera screen to facilitate this.
Waterproof and
dustproof. True as Bob, I have put this guy through some serious dust and water
tests, and it’s shone nearly every time. I even dared (though I had two weeks
of footage on the camera) of swimming out to an islet with the camera. I never
dived more than about 3m with the camera, but what I found is that the inside
of the camera misted up, and took hours to demist. Was there a tiny leak in the
housing, or another explanation? Uncertain, I never took the chance again so it
remains from henceforth a terrestrial camera.
The TFT screen is has
good resolution (921K pixels) and generally allows me to see whether something
is approximately in focus or not. I occasionally really appreciate the
flip-screen. Pity this is the weakest point of the camera. Not the hinge of the
screen which seems solid, rather that I placed it in my pocket along with my
credit-card holder. The plastic was enough to scratch the monitor and totally
impair my ability to see that portion of the screen which appears as a misty
lens. Unlike most compacts, I don’t find the lack of viewfinder much of a
hindrance in bright light, though it definitely could be brighter or less
reflective.
Crippled features
So they have some cool
features – like night photography. Pity that you can’t use this mode because
you can’t manually focus on the stars (and yes, focus is usually poor at
night).
LCD screen
One gripe I usually
have with cameras is the screen in bright African sunlight. I have to say I
didn’t find this on this camera. I found the screen generally usable in all
conditions, and of high enough resolution to determine whether focus is adequate
(though maybe I also use the sound of focusing for this to an extent). So kudos
to Olympus (though I would still like an OLED screen please).
Macro capability
I love and hate the
macro on this camera. With its quick on, quick foreground focus and flip
screen, a press of the button makes for a quick macro photograph. Is the photo
any good though. Below are two photos to highlight the good and bad of the
macro mode. A good depth of field at macro is challenging. Can I reduce the
depth of field to highlight a particular plant feature? No. Does it deliver
high quality pictures. No. They’re bright and delightful, but on closer
inspection especially in the corners it is not just lackluster, its downright
abhorrent. That means instead of composing my picture properly, I have to place
my image subject near the centre of the picture to ensure reasonable sharpness.
|
Good from far but far from good - picture soft off the centre. (but this is not super-macro which is far worse!) |
Functionality
Here’s what I love
about this camera. When all is said and done, and despite all the minor flaws –
this camera is great to use. It’s exposure is usually spot on. Focus is
super-quick and usually correct too. Sometimes I need to put my hand behind a
small subject to get focus lock, then remove my hand, but I think there is not
a compact camera out there that can match it for focus accuracy, and few DSLRs
would not stumble over similar subjects. What I love is that it PRIORITIZES
SUBJECTS IN THE FRONT (take note camera manufacturers). Thank you Olympus for
that! Startup is almost instant and because of the quicker focus, it’s quicker
to take a photo than my OM-D. I also love that it has the wide-angle perspective
on flowers and nature that really allows me to explore my subjects. Throw in
the ‘reflection’ filter, and I found myself spending literally hours exploring
a graveyard or a plant, and had to be dragged away by myself (like a scene out
of Fight Club) to continue. Touring Cape Verde I would frequently find myself
loving the solid feel of the camera and whipping it out when I encountered
something interesting. I felt like a gunslinger in the wild-west, pointing his
(or her :-P) gun at every bottle and taking a shot – though I think my kind of
shot is more rewarding!
The led light and flash
I also found the
inclusion of a LED light ridiculously useful. The LED light is great for macro footage
(except when the subject was really close) and for fill-in flash up close. I
frequently leave it on as a default. When I found I had left my headtorch on
the Canary Islands, this became my main torch (simply hold down the trigger
button to obtain light to setup camp/cook/eat/brush teeth with).
The flash is a bit
weak and not great for human subjects, but exposes well up close, even for
macro shots (take a lesson, Lumix with your terrible GH-2 flash
implementation!). Big kudos here Olympus.
|
A photo taken with the LED "flash". |
The battery
I found the battery
life to be adequate, but not great. Sometimes I’d make the mistake of taking a
movie, and within moments the low-battery indicator would flash. Darnit, I’d
just killed potential for another 50 images! Fortunately when paired with a
separate Powerbank or laptop, I could get several more charges out of the
camera without the need for electricity. It was even possible to photograph
with the Powerbank connected up.
The cable
Seriously Olympus!
When we have cables that are universal like micro-usb, why go and make a
slightly different proprietary Olympus cable. Besides the concern of losing my
cable, if I leave the cable behind it means I can’t charge the camera on a
trip. It’s that serious. It does mean that you don’t need a separate charger,
and can use a battery pack unlike the OM-D, but it also means requiring two
cables (one for mobile phone, one for camera) instead of one. Flippin’ use a standard micro-usb cable,
Olympus!
GPS
I found this both
fantastic and incredibly frustrating. In general a hot-start would take mere
seconds to obtain a fix. I liked that if I took a photo before it had a fix, it
would give the photo the previous locality. Not a bad assumption. What miffed
me though, is that there was no way to see which satellites it was picking up
or where they were. No indicator at all of it’s progress in this regard, except
that once it got a fix the flashing GPS would become fixed. Indeed no idea of
accuracy either – a fairly standard feature on anything with a GPS. So what
about when it didn’t work? Sometimes off a cold start it simply wouldn’t find a
GPS – I’m talking waiting for 10 minutes or till the camera automatically
turned off. This meant that sometimes I was wasting precious battery life
trying to obtain a fix. I recently tried it in the nearby forest, a place where
nearly every GPS struggles except my Garmin HCX gps, and no surprises, it
didn’t find a fix till I came out into the open. It even has the promise of
registering a track while the camera is turned off (don’t forget to save it to
access it from the computer). Yet with the track on and the camera off it still
seemed to take a while to obtain a fix – though it should have had one.
Mystifying!
One handed operation
Clinging from a cliff
while photographing a cremnophyte, one-handed operation is sometimes the most
difficult yet necessary thing to pull off. This camera does the job admirably.
Only problem is that if extending one’s hand to the subject, which is at
right-angles to one’s body, one then can’t see the screen. The OM-D flip screen
not only folds in to protect the screen, but allows sideways and downwards
flipping. It is even possible to access the menus one-handed, as one’s hand
grip changes to hold the camera with the index finger alongside the trigger and
zoom switch.
|
Aah, a normal selfie taken with Vintage picture style on. Good easy use of the camera's flip screen. |
|
Aaaaahhhh!!! Extreme photo taken of both Echium vulcanorum and I clinging to a cliff. |
|
A shot showing the arm in the way. This was taken ascending a treacherous cliff on San Vincente. |
Playback
This is an expedition
camera I want to use for long trips taking hundreds of pictures of plants a
day. The OM-D has the right idea with a calendar-like view if you scroll out
enough. The Tough just doesn’t. It shows 20 thumbnails at a time, it pauses
before scrolling, then scrolls too slowly. Press the trigger button and your
hard-earned position 1000 back is magically lost… again.
File Naming
Good thing I read this up on Ken Rockwell’s site otherwise I would have been mighty confused:
“Folders aren't a programmable option, but the file names cleverly begin with the month and date to help keep things straight.
Files are named as PMDD####.jpg.
P means normal
sRGB color.
M is the month; the months go 1234567890AB.
DD is the date.
Today is June 17th, so the files I shot today are P617####.jpg.”
Conclusion
For the form factor of
being able to slip this into a top pocket (where it fell out of at least twice
when I bent over), for the lightweight yet solid feel, for the rapid focus and the
almost indestructability, for the excellent macro capability, and the GPS I
would highly recommend this camera for expeditions or nature photography.
It loses serious marks
for the terrible super-macro picture/lens quality, for the terrible menu
functionality (erase issue), the lack of changing the aperture or locking of
exposure, manual focusing (even my old 995 had this!), for the poor
implementation of filters, particularly low panorama resolution, and for the
flip screen that is not scratch proof from even plastic.
Positives
+ form factor
+ build quality
+ lightweight
++ flip screen
+ 1 cm macro ability
++ wide angle macro
+ wide angle lens
++ GPS
+ easy one-handed
operation
+ quick startup
+ dedicated wide-angle
macro button at the front (though you have to set it up)
+ excellent flash
implementation
+ love the LED light
for fill-in purposes and as a flashlight
+ good video quality
Negatives
- panorama stitch
resolution and implementation
- lens sharpness
especially at macro
- no manual focus or
focus lock
- no manual setting of
exposure or locking of exposure
- poor focus in
low-light and at night
- really stupid erase
operation
- no focus or light
adjustments in video mode
- - proprietary camera
cable
- no raw images
In the end I give it a
much lauded Rogue Botanist 7/10. For documenting plants, between my OM-D and
this, I’d take this any day as I don’t need a separate GPS or to change the
lens for macro. It’s just quick and easy. Olympus - It could have been an easy
eight with decent software and menu implementation. If you didn’t cripple the camera it could have been a nine. To get that ten would have required a better
quality lens and a multi-direction scratch proof flip-screen.
If I could buy only
one camera on a limited budget for documenting plants – this would be it! Then
again – many smartphones cost the same but have better quality images, a GPS as
standard, are more versatile with upgradeble firmware / software, and can be
used for a myriad of other purposes. The role of dedicated compact cameras is
fast being eroded. You win the Rogue Botanist Award for toughness, but
certainly not for IQ. Your cameras got great potential, but it’s time to up your
game, Olympus!
A special mention to my sponsor: Hemporium who provide me with hemp t-shirts - the only clothing I trust for comfort and durability on an expedition. Hope you enjoyed the review - I'm off to tackle Mt. Kenya and Mt. Kilimanjaro in four hours. Happy botanizing!